{ "id": "case-18-005745-0007-co", "citation": "Exp. 18-005745-0007-CO", "section": "case_summaries", "doc_type": "case_summary", "title_es": "Audiencia pública en formulación de plan regulador municipal", "title_en": "Public hearing in municipal regulatory plan formulation", "summary_es": "Este expediente de la Sala Constitucional trata sobre un recurso de amparo presentado contra la Municipalidad de Orotina por la presunta falta de realización de una audiencia pública durante el proceso de formulación y aprobación del Plan Regulador cantonal. Los recurrentes alegaron violación a los derechos a un ambiente sano, participación ciudadana e información, amparados en los artículos 50 y 30 de la Constitución, así como en la normativa ambiental y urbanística vigente, particularmente la Ley de Planificación Urbana (Ley 4240) y los reglamentos sobre elaboración de planes reguladores (Decretos 32967 y 42278). La controversia central radicó en determinar si la municipalidad estaba obligada a convocar a audiencia pública en la fase de elaboración del plan, y si su omisión vulneraba los derechos fundamentales de los vecinos. El caso fue examinado por la Sala Constitucional, que analizó el marco jurídico aplicable a los planes reguladores y la naturaleza de la participación ciudadana en estos procesos. Se verificó si efectivamente se había incumplido con el requisito de audiencia pública y, en su caso, qué consecuencias jurídicas se derivaban de esa omisión, así como si procedía la tutela constitucional mediante el recurso de amparo. La decisión final de la Sala Constitucional determinó si hubo infracción constitucional y cómo debía subsanarse.", "summary_en": "This Constitutional Chamber case file concerns an amparo action filed against the Municipality of Orotina for the alleged failure to hold a public hearing during the formulation and approval process of the cantonal Regulatory Plan. The petitioners alleged violations of the rights to a healthy environment, citizen participation, and information, protected by Articles 50 and 30 of the Constitution, as well as by current environmental and urban planning regulations, particularly the Urban Planning Law (Law 4240) and the regulations on regulatory plan preparation (Decrees 32967 and 42278). The central dispute was whether the municipality was obligated to call a public hearing during the plan’s drafting phase, and whether its omission violated the fundamental rights of the neighbors. The Constitutional Chamber examined the legal framework applicable to regulatory plans and the nature of citizen participation in these processes. It verified whether the public hearing requirement had actually been breached and, if so, what legal consequences derived from that omission, and whether constitutional protection through amparo was appropriate. The Chamber's final decision determined whether a constitutional violation occurred and how it should be remedied.", "court_or_agency": "", "date": "", "year": "", "topic_ids": [ "environmental-law-7554", "procedural-environmental" ], "primary_topic_id": "environmental-law-7554", "es_concept_hints": [ "plan regulador", "audiencia pública", "participación ciudadana", "amparo ambiental", "Sala Constitucional", "artículo 50", "Ley 4240", "in dubio pro natura" ], "concept_anchors": [ { "article": "Art. 50", "law": "Constitución Política" }, { "article": "Art. 30", "law": "Constitución Política" }, { "article": "Ley de Planificación Urbana", "law": "Ley 4240" }, { "article": "Reglamento sobre Elaboración de Planes Reguladores", "law": "Decreto 32967" } ], "keywords_es": [ "audiencia pública", "plan regulador", "participación ciudadana", "derecho a un ambiente sano", "artículo 50 constitución", "Sala Constitucional", "Municipalidad de Orotina", "amparo", "Ley 4240", "Decreto 32967" ], "keywords_en": [ "public hearing", "regulatory plan", "citizen participation", "right to a healthy environment", "Article 50 Constitution", "Constitutional Chamber", "Municipality of Orotina", "amparo", "Law 4240", "Decree 32967" ], "excerpt_es": "La parte recurrente impugna la omisión de la Municipalidad de Orotina de convocar a una audiencia pública dentro del procedimiento de formulación y aprobación del Plan Regulador cantonal, considerando que tal omisión vulnera los derechos fundamentales a un ambiente sano, a la participación ciudadana y al acceso a la información, reconocidos en los artículos 50 y 30 de la Constitución Política, así como en la normativa especial de la materia. El caso fue admitido por la Sala Constitucional para examinar si la omisión denunciada resultaba inconstitucional y si procedía otorgar la tutela solicitada por la vía del recurso de amparo.", "excerpt_en": "The petitioners challenge the omission of the Municipality of Orotina to call a public hearing within the procedure for the formulation and approval of the cantonal Regulatory Plan, considering that such omission violates the fundamental rights to a healthy environment, citizen participation, and access to information, recognized in Articles 50 and 30 of the Political Constitution, as well as in the special regulations on the matter. The case was admitted by the Constitutional Chamber to examine whether the denounced omission was unconstitutional and whether it was appropriate to grant the requested relief through the amparo remedy.", "outcome": { "label_en": "Admitted, pending ruling", "label_es": "Admitido, pendiente resolución", "summary_en": "The Constitutional Chamber admitted the amparo action to examine whether the Municipality of Orotina's omission to hold a public hearing in the regulatory plan formulation violates fundamental rights, without the summary indicating a final ruling on the merits.", "summary_es": "La Sala Constitucional admitió el recurso de amparo para examinar si la omisión de la Municipalidad de Orotina de celebrar una audiencia pública en la formulación del plan regulador viola derechos fundamentales, sin que el resumen indique la decisión final sobre el fondo." }, "pull_quotes": [ { "context": "Descripción del recurso", "quote_en": "The petitioners challenge the omission of the Municipality of Orotina to call a public hearing within the procedure for the formulation and approval of the cantonal Regulatory Plan, considering that such omission violates the fundamental rights to a healthy environment, citizen participation, and access to information.", "quote_es": "La parte recurrente impugna la omisión de la Municipalidad de Orotina de convocar a una audiencia pública dentro del procedimiento de formulación y aprobación del Plan Regulador cantonal, considerando que tal omisión vulnera los derechos fundamentales a un ambiente sano, a la participación ciudadana y al acceso a la información." }, { "context": "Admisibilidad del recurso", "quote_en": "The case was admitted by the Constitutional Chamber to examine whether the denounced omission was unconstitutional and whether it was appropriate to grant the requested relief through the amparo remedy.", "quote_es": "El caso fue admitido por la Sala Constitucional para examinar si la omisión denunciada resultaba inconstitucional y si procedía otorgar la tutela solicitada por la vía del recurso de amparo." } ], "cites": [], "cited_by": [], "references": { "internal": [ { "target_id": "norm-35669", "kind": "concept_anchor", "label": "Ley 4240 Ley de Planificación Urbana" }, { "target_id": "norm-57062", "kind": "concept_anchor", "label": "Decreto 32967 Reglamento sobre Elaboración de Planes Reguladores" } ], "external": [] }, "source_url": "https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/asunto_cons/asu_asunto_const.aspx?nValor1=1¶m5=18-005745-0007-CO&strTipM=E", "tier": 2, "_editorial_citation_count": 0, "regulations_by_article": null, "cascade_only": false, "amendment_count": 0, "body_es_text": "", "body_en_text": "{\n \"page_type\": \"asu_case_summary\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/asunto_cons/asu_asunto_const.aspx?nValor1=1¶m5=18-005745-0007-CO&strTipM=E\",\n \"expediente\": \"18-005745-0007-CO\",\n \"nexus_links\": [],\n \"related_cases\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"constitutional_case_summary\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/asunto_cons/asu_asunto_const.aspx?param1=ASC&nValor1=1¶m5=18-005745-0007-CO&strTipM=E\",\n \"label\": \"Expediente\",\n \"expediente\": \"18-005745-0007-CO\"\n }\n ],\n \"links\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"http://www.pgr.go.cr\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr:443/scij/avanzada_pgr.aspx\",\n \"label\": \"INICIO\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/main.aspx\",\n \"label\": \"PGR SINALEVI\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"nexus_link\",\n \"url\": \"https://nexuspj.poder-judicial.go.cr/\",\n \"label\": \"PODER JUDICIAL\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"hacienda_jurisprudencia\",\n \"url\": \"https://scij.hacienda.go.cr/SCIJ_MHDA/default.aspx\",\n \"label\": \"HACIENDA\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"corte_idh\",\n \"url\": \"http://www.corteidh.or.cr/index.php/es\",\n \"label\": \"CORTE IDH\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/actas_constituyente.aspx\",\n \"label\": \"ACTAS CONSTITUYENTE\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/ayuda_pgr.aspx\",\n \"label\": \"AYUDA\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/mapa_sitio.aspx\",\n \"label\": \"MAPA DEL SITIO\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr:443/scij/avanzada_pgr.aspx\",\n \"label\": \"Menú de Búsquedas Avanzadas\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"constitutional_case_summary\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/asunto_cons/asu_asunto_const.aspx?param1=ASC&nValor1=1¶m5=18-005745-0007-CO&strTipM=E\",\n \"label\": \"Expediente\",\n \"expediente\": \"18-005745-0007-CO\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/asunto_cons/asu_normas_cuestionadas.aspx?param1=ASN&nValor1=1¶m5=18-005745-0007-CO&strTipM=NC\",\n \"label\": \"Normas cuestionadas\",\n \"expediente\": \"18-005745-0007-CO\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"pgr_scij\",\n \"url\": \"https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/asunto_cons/asu_informe_pgr.aspx?ContInforme=0¶m1=AIP&nValor1=1¶m5=18-005745-0007-CO¶mInf=1&strTipM=IP1\",\n \"label\": \"Informe de la PGR 1\",\n \"expediente\": \"18-005745-0007-CO\"\n }\n ],\n \"next_actions\": [\n \"NEXUS LINKS: These are court documents in Poder Judicial system\",\n \"Use scrape-nexus.py to fetch nexus_document URLs\",\n \"Related cases may cite the same laws - follow for complete picture\"\n ]\n}" }